User Tools

Site Tools


telecoms:covcable-localprogramming

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
telecoms:covcable-localprogramming [17/03/2026 19:32] – [Edit 3 - 3 VTR edit suite] andrewtelecoms:covcable-localprogramming [17/03/2026 21:08] (current) – [Studio / Gallery] andrew
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 Unfortunately, due to the lower numbers of subscribers and the small advertising revenue the local programming was scaled back to a volunteer based operation and eventually ceased altogether. Unfortunately, due to the lower numbers of subscribers and the small advertising revenue the local programming was scaled back to a volunteer based operation and eventually ceased altogether.
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 +
 ===== Studio / Gallery ===== ===== Studio / Gallery =====
  
Line 9: Line 14:
 A two camera studio and gallery was built on the top floor, unfortunately because of the sloping roof, the studio shape was not cubic, which didn't help. As space was limited, there was no prop storage space, so all programmes had a very similar feel to them, and the lighting rig (using if I remember 1Kw fresnels) tended to heat up the studio to a rather unpleasant temperature. A two camera studio and gallery was built on the top floor, unfortunately because of the sloping roof, the studio shape was not cubic, which didn't help. As space was limited, there was no prop storage space, so all programmes had a very similar feel to them, and the lighting rig (using if I remember 1Kw fresnels) tended to heat up the studio to a rather unpleasant temperature.
  
-The cameras were Sony 3 tube multicore cameras connected to a CCU in the gallery. Each was equipped with an autocue, very useful but it made the whole tripod setup front heavy and unweildly to move about. As the studio was quite small, not much room to actually move the tripod either. +The cameras were Sony 3 tube multicore cameras connected to a CCU in the gallery. Each was equipped with an Autocue, very useful but it made the whole tripod setup front heavy as the Autocue monitor was a B/W CRT. As the studio was quite small, there was not much room to actually move the tripod either. The Autocue was basic, it was driven from a B/W camera mounted over a platform for either A4 pages to be places but could scroll a continuous roll of paper too - driven by a hand crank..... Very basic.
  
 {{ :telecoms:studiogallery.jpg?250|Studio Gallery}} {{ :telecoms:studiogallery.jpg?250|Studio Gallery}}
Line 17: Line 22:
  
 Graphics were provided by an Aston character generator. On the floor at the right hand side can be seen a High Band U-matic which was used to record. Later there were two VTRs fitted in a rack allowing inserts to be played into a programme. One of these was a Betacam to playback the tapes from the portable ENG style camera (centre in the camera picture). Graphics were provided by an Aston character generator. On the floor at the right hand side can be seen a High Band U-matic which was used to record. Later there were two VTRs fitted in a rack allowing inserts to be played into a programme. One of these was a Betacam to playback the tapes from the portable ENG style camera (centre in the camera picture).
 +
 +These two VTRs also allowed basic editing but also enabled captioning from the Aston and video wiped and audio monitoring via the vision and audio mixers.
 +
 +----
  
  
Line 28: Line 37:
  
 Equipment provided was a 4 track Tascam 1/4" reel to reel recorder, a Sony MXP10 audio mixer and a record turntable. Equipment provided was a 4 track Tascam 1/4" reel to reel recorder, a Sony MXP10 audio mixer and a record turntable.
 +
 +
 +----
 +
 ==== Edit 2 - 2 VTR edit suite ==== ==== Edit 2 - 2 VTR edit suite ====
 +
 +{{telecoms:edit3-controller.png?200 |}}
 +No pics of Edit2, from memory it was adjacent to the Studio on the top floor, and a basic 2-vtr suite initially without a discrete edit controller, Betacam players and recorders could be linked via the 9-pin interface and the recorder would control the player. Later I remember a similar controller to this on the left. 
 +
 +
 +----
  
  
-No pics of Edit2, from memory it was adjacent to the Studio on the top floor, and a basic 2-vtr suite without a discrete edit controller, Betacam players and recorders could be linked via the 9-pin interface and the recorder would control the player. 
  
 ==== Edit 3 - 3 VTR edit suite ==== ==== Edit 3 - 3 VTR edit suite ====
Line 38: Line 56:
 Edit 3 was a 3 machine suite with a Sony edit controller to control two Betacam players and a U-matic Hiband recorder. To allow disolves, a Grass Valley video mixer was included, and a Sony MXP10 audio desk. Edit 3 was a 3 machine suite with a Sony edit controller to control two Betacam players and a U-matic Hiband recorder. To allow disolves, a Grass Valley video mixer was included, and a Sony MXP10 audio desk.
  
-Basic monitoring was peovided by a 2U waveform monitor and vectorscope. +Basic monitoring was provided by a 2U waveform monitor and vectorscope.  
 + 
 + 
 +----
  
-{{ :telecoms:edit3-controller.png?400|}} 
 ===== MCR / Presentation ===== ===== MCR / Presentation =====
  
telecoms/covcable-localprogramming.1773775931.txt.gz · Last modified: by andrew

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki